When people ask me about my hobbies, or about the way I spend my free time, I usually answer (not without feeling a bit proud) that I enjoy painting. Many of my friends are professional artists, I took lessons from them, and gradually became a rather good painter for an amateur. I even had several exhibitions in my town’s galleries. Art is a subject I have a keen interest in, and I consider myself competent in; I can enjoy both classic and avant-garde art. But what I cannot understand, no matter how much I try, is a phenomenon called contemporary art.
I have been attending contemporary art events rather often, and I have figured out three main categories of art presented at such exhibitions. The first category focuses on shock. Racism, violence, sexual content, nihilism, cynicism, and all kinds of perversions—this is what one can expect when someone attends an ultra-modern and conceptual artist’s exposition. Among the most impressing—in a negative kind of way—I can mention certain works by Andres Serrano, or “The Holy Virgin Mary” by Chris Ofili; both of them are considered religiously insulting. The website “Possession” introduces a half-joking formula for American shock art: use the sum of feces and religious symbols multiplied by media as a numerator, and a right-wing politician as a denominator (Possession). Shock art can insult or cause disgust, but it is not art in its original meaning; I think if a person wants to offend their audience, they might call them names, humiliate them, or manifest aggression towards them. The effect would be greater.
The next category of contemporary art is what I call extra-conceptual art. By this term, I mean that a piece of art bears such complex and implicit meaning that it is only the artists themselves who can understand their work (not always, though). Martin Heidegger, one of the most influential and famous philosophers of the 20th century, was confused about certain points of his own philosophy. Similarly, sometimes I have a feeling many modern artists have no idea about the meaning of their own oeuvre. For me, the best example of such extra-conceptual art is Damien Hirst’s “For the Love of God.” This is a skull made of platinum and diamonds, which costs 100 million dollars. Obviously, Hirst had put some meaning into it. But what was it?
The third category is art that aims to be completely meaningless. This kind of contemporary art does not carry any aesthetic value, it will not fit into your interior—it simply exists. Its only function is to fill empty spaces on the walls in art galleries. A Monaco-based art dealer Mr. David Nahmad in his interview with the British newspaper “Independent” claimed that modern art is a fraud in most cases (Independent). Looking at some pieces of contemporary art, I agree with this thesis. The brightest example of meaningless art for me is a video artwork by Tracey Emin, which depicts an average-looking woman riding a horse. No notable objects appearing, no culmination or introduction. Perhaps, you should be a genius to notice any other meaning in this artwork, except a woman riding a horse.
Despite my sincere and deep interest in art—from classic to avant-garde—I am not afraid to admit that I completely do not get contemporary art. In my perspective, it looks either shocking, or ultra-complex, or meaningless. Though I may remember the most shocking or senseless artworks, I would rather forget about their existence.
“The User-Friendly Guide to Shock Art.” Possession. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Sept. 2013. <http://www.possessionsessions.com/2008/11/user-friendly-guide-to-shock-art.html>.
Johnson, Andrew. “Contemporary Art is a Fraud, Says Top Dealer.” The Independent. Independent Digital News and Media, 22 Feb. 2009. Web. 04 Sept. 2013. <http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/news/contemporary-art-is-a-fraud-says-top-dealer-1628929.html>.
Sign up and we’ll send you ebook of 1254 samples like this for free!
- 80+ essay types
- 1000+ essay samples
- Pro writing tips
Related Writing Guides
Writing a Reflective Essay
Contemporary Art Essay
2541 Words11 Pages
Contemporary Art: Dealing with Post-Modernity
− ”Art worlds consist of all the people whose activities are necessary to the production of the characteristic works which that world, and perhaps others as well, define as art. … By observing how an art world makes those distinctions rather than trying to make them ourselves we can understand much of what goes on in that world.... The basic unit of analysis, then, is an art world.”
- Howard Becker (Art Worlds)
Postmodernism deconstructs Modernism like Modernism deconstructed art
Like the Simpson's episode that explained Po-Mo as “weird for the sake of weird”,
Postmodernism accepted the philosophy “art for the sake of art”. A very free and democratic practice, a natural response…show more content…
Postmodernism embraces hypertext and hyperplicity, or the rejection of centralized control. It looses trust in the media and public communication, embracing simulacrum as a hyper-reality that was only long-ago based on some sort of truth. Most importantly, Postmodernism rejects the
Modernist idea of high art as normative and dominant. Instead, it merges the concept of “low” and “high” art, effectively canceling them both. Where Modernism saw a work of art as a finished product, signed by the artist and authenticated by the art market,
Postmodernism sees art as a recycling of culture, authenticated by whatever audience that may be. Where Modern art is a separate dichotomy of contrasting themes (organic/nonorganic, realist/abstract), Postmodern art mixes all available ideas into a sensational pastiche. Finally Modernism clearly divided normity versus sexual difference and pornography. Postmodernism embraces whatever ideas have an audience, and mixes polymorphous sexuality and pornography with mainstream media. Postmodernist art and media reject the linear way of working, building upon a specific discourse and ideology. It embraces instead, an anything-goes attitude, expanding mediums and messages into multiple directions. As long as there's an audience somewhere, the work can be considered legitimate art.
Modernist trends in the Postmodern Art-World
It is important to note - since the work is still authenticated by its audience, art still