Second Claim Paragraph
Another reason abortion [should/should not] be legal is [that/the fact that] [provide your second claim for or against the legality of abortion.]
Another reason abortion [is/is not] [moral/ethical] is [that/the fact that] [provide your second claim about the moral or ethical status of abortion.]
- Abortion is a fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution (Roe vs. Wade)
- Abortion is a women's right to make decisions about her own body
- Abortion is not painful to the fetus
- Abortion, when legal, is safer
- Abortion can be a good financial decision
- Abortion is wrong because it is equivalent to the murder of a human being
- Life begins at conception, so fetuses have human rights
- Abortion is painful to the fetus
- Abortions can cause psychological trauma
- Abortion can cause major medical problems for the mother
Should women have the right for abortion if serious handicaps are detected in their unborn children?
The recent movement that “Black Lives Matter” can move one to question that, well, do not all lives matter. It is bemusing that left wing liberals go to extremes to champion animal rights, but when it comes to the lives of babies in the womb not only are they adamant about killing them through that vulgar process of abortion, but they protest in favor of that and the picking apart of fetuses for what they justify is in the name of science. “The fetus is more visible than ever before and the abortion-rights movement needs to accept its existence and its value” (Kissling, 2011).
Recently an undercover plot by pro-life folk was performed wherein the operators of mutilating fetuses was heralded by those doctors and assistants of whom these guerrillas with hidden cameras busted. As the elitist killers ate their lunch the camera caught them laughing about slicing up a fetus for parts where said fetus still had a heartbeat, and even one of the women in charge of such hoped the lucrative trend would continue so she could, “Buy a Lamborghini.”
So, brass tax, should parents with a handicap fetus kill the baby? No. God ordained that baby to be born, to be loved, and to make a difference in someone’s life. How can a murder produce happiness? How can the murder of a handicap child provide happiness for a couple’s lifetime, for would they not pine away thinking of what joy they might have experienced caring for this special one had they not aborted it?
Autism is rampant. The cause for them is prevalent, the awareness and fund raising is paramount. All of these special children are adored and get much attention, but what if they were murdered by the thousands in the womb because they are handicapped? Is it biologically plausible that prior maternal induced abortions elevate a newborn baby’s autism risk? In a word, yes. This is because of two mechanisms and raised parental age at delivery. Every product of procreation has potential. If we kill them off one-by-one how much better are we than Hitler killing millions of Jews, or Saddam Hussein raping and killing hundreds of thousands of his own people? The handicapped are a very special and peculiar and beautiful group of people. How dare we kill them before they have had a chance to reach their potential? After all, who gave us permission to murder the less fortunate? We are no better than those who propose eugenics or criminals that simply murder blatantly.
Admittedly this is a difficult subject to broach, but if only the good die young potential will be cut short before fruition. Abortion is genocide. Abortion of the handicap is target practice for unethical so called “doctors” like shooting fish in a barrel. The only hope these babies have is their guardians’ decision to let them live. Then there are those mothers who forego abortion in hopes of having a perfect kid, as is evidenced by Kanner that a “mother’s fleeting thought of an induced abortion was counteracted by the firm determination to rear ‘a perfect baby” (1949).
Be it afflicted or the perfect specimen, life is life. With this truth who could end it without the permission of the one being killed, for do they not have a say about their own lives?
Handicapped or perfect, everyone deserves the right to live where they get to choose their own path, but if that opportunity is nipped in the bud by abortion how will we ever know their potential? Some food for thought, Albert Einstein’s mother almost had an abortion. Handicapped or not, we should, as humans, be allowed to have a chance at life. Lastly, there is this bumper sticker that says, “Aren’t you glad your mother was pro-life?” Now the choice is yours.
Kanner, L., (1949). Problems of Nosology and Psychodynamics of Early Infantile Autism. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 19:416-26.
Kissling, F., (2011). Abortion rights are under attack, and pro-choice advocates are caught in a time warp. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2011/02/18/AR2011021802434.html
The argumentative essay example you’ve recently read was written by one of our writers. We have dozens of similar papers published on our site to help you in your studies. Enjoy reading our blog while we will take care about your academic papers. How to get assistance from us? Place an order specifying your requirements and wait for the promised delivery. No matter how tight your deadline and topic will be, our writers will cope with them!